Collective Secret
According to anthropologist Michael Taussig, the knowledge of what not to know, what not to say and what not to see is the most powerful form of social knowledge.
The social tactics and behaviors through which we communicate and create a community constitute the surfaces, faces and interfaces where structures of power are reproduced and challenged – language, ceremony, art, all supported by the depths of public secrecy that they conceal and reveal in a measured balance in movement. Truth and lie are not opposites, neither are they mutually exclusive - they rather complement and mutually generate each other.
The negotiation of what can be spoken and visible at any moment in social history and the conditions for transgressing these boundaries are set out a playground. In Huo Rf and Abdi Cadani’s video “Abstract Lies (Chapter 1)” and in the accompanying publication, fiction, falsehood and play, as well as techniques of self-presentation and risk calculations appear as plastic materials: redefining the parameters of truth and knowledge, speaking the unspeakable and opening up a space for the performance of subjectivity within this field are conditioned at times on the suspension of disbelief, at others on invisibility tactics.
“Abstract Lies (Part I)”, centers social interaction tactics geared toward the maintenance of a sense normalcy by pretending that everything is alright, to be able to carry on and sustain everyday life against the backdrop of an ongoing societal crisis that cannot be spoken. Relying on methods of conversation and interview, the video occupies a transitional space between documentary, fiction and performance. While food and table rituals define the ceremonial framework of gathering as a surface waiting to be scratched, the backdrop of official social and political statements catches the eye like a glitch, for a brief moment. In “Abstract Lies”, we observe five women, one after the other, in their personal spaces. Habits of cooking and consuming food on one hand, choices of make-up and fashion on the other appear as two fields of intersection between personal and collective, biographical and historical, presented through the axis of gender.
Within the duration of the video, there is a progression from the personal to the social in the order of the women whose portraits we watch: starting with Münevver and Fardous, the respective mothers of Huo Rf and Abdi Cadani, moving on to close acquaintances Nazan and artist CANAN, and finally to Derya Baykal, a celebrity with high visibility value through her acting and TV programs. By explaining her gray nail polish choice in saying, "you do it because everyone does it" and later in relation to food, "we do not eat fries, and so does everyone else", Baykal summarizes the relationship between personal preferences, techniques of self-presentation and power structures, possibly in the most concrete way. The area of the unspoken grows as long as it is not spoken, we invest more on the surfaces, we expand the area of language on the surface, and the "intermediate" state of the interface disappears and becomes independent. In the statements of Cadani’s mother Fardous who does not use make up, and Canan, who likes to shine, we find clues about the rejection of this surface and its transformation into a playground. This leads up to some questions: When does collaboration become sabotage, how can we switch from the order of approval to acts of disorder, tricksterism and fiction – into the grounds of a serious play?
We follow such questions triggered by the video, through the paths opened up by five different women (Nora Tataryan, İz Öztat, Marina Papazyan, Amaal Abdirahman, Vardal Caniş) who have agreed to participate in this publication with original pieces of writing around the notion of “lie”. In these paths, truth and its knowledge appear to be formed in fiction, poetry and storytelling: truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that this is what they are.
Beyond the collaboration of Huo Rf and Abdi Cadani, through these contributions, we are presented with a fully collective production, both in the video and the publication. In this sense, the video, which conveys the shifting relationship between truth and lie as the result of a collective composition; and the publication, which constructs truth as the matter of artistic production, complement each other.
The next chapters, signaled by the title of the work, point to a process and new interviews and questions that are being shaped in the course of a process.
Aslı Seven